Gulf of Oman tanker ‘attacks’: What we know

Two tankers have been damaged by explosions in the Gulf of Oman, a strategic waterway crucial to global energy supplies.

It is the second time in the past few weeks that tankers appear to have been attacked in the region and comes amid escalating tension between Iran and the United States.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Iran was behind what he described as the latest in a series of “unprovoked attacks”. He said the US had made its assessment based on intelligence about the type of weapons used.

But a senior Iranian official told the BBC: “Iran has no connection with the incident.”

To back up its version of events, the US military released a video which it says shows Iran’s Revolutionary Guard removing an unexploded limpet mine from one of the ships – hours after the initial detonations.

Media captionSecurity correspondent Frank Gardner looks at the evidence the US says proves Iran’s involvement in Thursday’s attacks

What happened on Thursday?

The Panama-listed Kokuka Courageous and the Marshall Islands-flagged Front Altair were both sailing south-eastwards through international waters, after passing through the Strait of Hormuz, when they were rocked by explosions.

The Front Altair was carrying 75,000 tonnes of naphtha from the United Arab Emirates to Taiwan.

Its managers, International Tanker Management, said a fire broke out on board following an explosion. The master decided to abandon the vessel and the 23 crew members, who were unharmed, were picked up by the cargo ship Hyundai Dubai.

Map showing the location of the two vessels as of 08:00 GMT

Taiwan’s state oil refiner CPC Corp, which had chartered the vessel, told Reuters news agency that it was “suspected of being hit by a torpedo” at about 04:00 GMT.

The tanker’s owner, Norwegian company Frontline, denied reports that it had sunk and said the crew – 11 Russians, 11 Filipinos and one Georgian – were rescued by the Hyundai Dubai.

According to a US intelligence report seen by CBS News, soon after the Hyundai Dubai took the crew onboard, it was surrounded by Iranian military boats and told to hand the men over.

The ship’s captain contacted his company’s management, who told him to refuse Iran’s request. However the captain allegedly told US authorities that “he felt like he had no choice” and handed the crew over to the Iranians.

A handout photo made available by the Norwegian company Frontline showing the tanker Front Altair after a fire onboard the ship in the Gulf of Oman (13 June 2019)
Image captionFirefighters managed to extinguish the blaze on board the Front Altair

Photographs published by Iranian media showed a fire on Front Altair’s starboard side, and a huge column of black smoke towering above it.

Despite staying afloat, the damage may have caused some spillage of oil into the ocean. Satellite imaging company Iceye said it had identified the location of the Front Altair from marine location tracking data.

It said the photographs, taken on Monday, showed “a non-trivial amount of oil around the vessel on the surface of the sea”, but recommended a third party assess the quantity involved.

A top-down satellite shot shows a ship upon the ocean, but the colours are unreal and vibrant, with the sea a vivid purple rather than its usual blue - and in this heightened colour state, dark patches can be seen floating on the ocean surface
Image captionWith colours altered to enhance contrast, apparent oil slicks can be seen upon the surface

The Kokuka Courageous was reportedly carrying about 25,000 tonnes of methanol from Saudi Arabia to Singapore.

Its managers, Bernhard Schulte Shipmanagement, said the vessel was damaged “as a result of a suspected attack” that breached the hull above the water line on the starboard side. There was a fire in the engine room, but the crew was safe, with one minor injury reported, it added.

Yutaka Katada, the president of Japanese company Kokuka Sangyo which owns the vessel, said it was hit twice before the crew abandoned ship.

After the US military alleged that Iranian limpet mines were responsible, Mr Katada on Monday said sailors saw “flying objects” before the attack, according to the Associated Press – apparently contradicting the US narrative.

He had also earlier spoken of being hit by a “shell”, rather than a mine.

Kokuka Sangyo president Yutaka Katada points to a photograph of the tanker Kokuka Courageous (13 June)
Image captionYutaka Katada said his company’s tanker, Kokuka Courageous, was hit by two blasts

“We have had an initial report that our ship… was hit by a shell. After that, our crew saw that other ships came under fire and moved around to avoid this,” Mr Katada told reporters. “Three hours later it was hit again.”

Iran’s state news agency, Irna, said the first incident occurred on the Front Altair at 04:20 GMT, when it was 25 nautical miles (46km) off the Iranian port of Jask. At 05:20, the Kokuka Courageous caught fire about 28 miles off Jask, it added.

Irna cited an informed source as saying that an Iranian naval rescue unit from Hormozgan province had rescued 44 crew members from the two tankers, and transferred them all to Jask.

File photo showing the USS Bainbridge in the Arabian Sea (17 May 2019)
Image captionThe USS Bainbridge, a guided missile destroyer, came to the stricken vessels’ assistance

US network CBS, referring to the intelligence report, said a Dutch vessel responded to a distress call from the Kokuka Courageous and rescued the ship’s crew. In a similar situation to Hyundai Dubai, it, too, was surrounded by Iranian military boats which sought permission to board “so they could transfer personnel and render assistance to the crew.” Unlike the Kokuka Courageous, however, the Dutch vessel rejected Iran’s request.

The US Navy’s Fifth Fleet, which is based in Bahrain, said its forces in the region received two separate distress calls at 03:12 GMT and 04:00 GMT, and that USS Bainbridge, a guided missile destroyer, “rendered assistance”.

A US defence official told CNN the USS Bainbridge had been nearby when the incidents happened, and that it took on board 21 crew members rescued by a tug boat from the Kokuka Courageous.

Another official told CBS News the US believed it would be able to recover enough debris “to come up with solid evidence for tracing them back to their source”.

What has been the reaction?

UN Secretary General António Guterres said he strongly condemned any attack against civilian vessels and warned that the world could not afford “a major confrontation in the Gulf region”.

EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini called for “maximum restraint”.

The acting US permanent representative to the UN, Jonathan Cohen, said it was “unacceptable for any party to attack commercial shipping” and that Thursday’s incidents “raise serious concerns”.

Media captionWhy does the Strait of Hormuz matter?

“Suspicious doesn’t begin to describe what likely transpired this morning,” said Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, noting that it came as Japan’s prime minister met Iran’s supreme leader to discuss how to ease regional tensions.

Paolo d’Amico, chairman of the International Association of Independent Tanker Owners, warned: “We need to remember that some 30% of the world’s crude oil passes through the Strait [of Hormuz]. If the waters are becoming unsafe, the supply to the entire Western world could be at risk.”

What happened in May?

The damaged UAE-flagged tanker A Michel seen off the Port of Fujairah (13 May 2019)
Image captionThe four vessels damaged off the UAE coast in May did not have to be evacuated

Four tankers were damaged by explosions within the UAE’s territorial waters in the Gulf of Oman, east of the emirate of Fujairah, in the early hours of 12 May.

The vessels were the Saudi Arabia-flagged Amjad and Al Marzoqah, the Norwegian-flagged Andrea Victory, and the UAE-flagged tanker A Michel.

There were no casualties, but the explosions blew holes in the tankers’ hulls. Saudi Arabia’s government said the two Saudi ships suffered “significant” damage.

A report presented by the UAE to UN Security Council in members said the blasts were the result of “a sophisticated and co-ordinated operation carried out by an actor with significant operational capacity, most likely a state actor”.

A combination of undated photographs provided on 6 June 2019 by the United Arab Emirates mission to the United Nations show underwater damage to the (clockwise from top left) Saudi tanker Amjad, Saudi tanker Al Marzoqah, Norwegian tanker Andrea Victory and Emirati tanker A Michel in the Port of Fujairah
Image captionPhotographs released by the UAE authorities showed damage to the hulls of (clockwise from top left) the Amjad, Al Marzoqah, Andrea Victory and A Michel

The report said the operation involved small, fast boats and trained divers, who were likely to have placed limpet mines with a high degree of precision on the vessels’ hulls below the waterline. Their intention, investigators concluded, was to disable the vessels but not destroy them. The four explosive charges were all detonated within less than an hour, according to the report.

The report stopped short of directly accusing a particular country.

However, Saudi Arabia’s permanent representative to the UN, Abdallah al-Mouallimi, said it believed that “responsibility for this action lies on the shoulders of Iran”, saying: “We believe there is enough evidence to demonstrate that.”

US National Security Adviser John Bolton has said the explosive charges were “naval mines almost certainly from Iran”, without providing any evidence. A US destroyer in the region also reportedly tracked 20 Iranian military boats entering UAE waters a few hours before the explosions.

Iran dismissed Mr Bolton’s accusation that it was involved as “ridiculous”.